Data quality may not be the most exciting aspect of big data plans, but it's vital to their success.
By Rachel Wheeler
Nov 9 2012, 22:55 PM
Data quality may not be the most exciting aspect of big data plans, but it's vital to their success. Companies that don't prioritize data quality efforts by assigning responsibility to highly qualified individuals and regularly monitoring efforts could not only find that they have wasted their investments, but the issues that arise could have permanent consequences.
In a recent incident, insurance provide[r] Prudential was fined by the British Information Commissioner's Office for a breach of the Data Protection Act stemming from data quality issues. The act states that "personal data shall be accurate and, where necessary, up to date". However, the company accidentally merged the information stored in two clients' records who shared a birthday and name.
Companies like Prudential that have approximately 6 million customers should implement better data quality tools to prevent this from taking place, since there was a strong likelihood its clients shared a common name and other basic identifying information, Information Age adds.
If enterprises take a more proactive approach by developing better relationships between company heads such as chief financial officers (CFOs) and chief risk officers (CROs), they can join forces on data quality issues to prevent potentially damaging oversights.
Finding the right parameters to measure data quality
- Aug 19 2014, 12:32 PM
Establishing data quality is often harder than it looks.
Exploring the true value of auditing your data for quality
- Aug 18 2014, 10:32 AM
Having dirty data can be costly. Audits can help.
Discovering the truth about 'big data' in the enterprise
- Aug 5 2014, 22:40 PM
A lot of hype has been building about "big data."